It's
Not Enough to See the Light
October
2006
By Mike Perkins
BMW CCA/Houston Chapter Technical Advisor
Owner - Bavarian Machine Specialties |
This article is also available
as a PDF file:
 |
|
Imagine
you are driving to work in the early morning rush hour
traffic. It’s still dark and it’s
rainy but the freeway traffic is moving along smoothly. Suddenly
you notice a change in something. Your BMW is loosing
power! A quick glance at the instrument cluster reveals
no warning lights and the fuel is still half full. As
you frantically scan the mirrors and glance over your shoulder
for a quick maneuver to the side of the freeway, the car
dies. You’re left stranded, sitting on the side
of the road as cars fly by at 70 mph. You attempt to
put the hazard lights on but, they too don’t seem to
work. As you sit there waiting for help or a tow truck,
thoughts come to mind of how late you are going to be and
how this will strain your already busy day. You also
start thinking about the last time your BMW was serviced
but more importantly, how something like this could happen. After
all, you take your BMW in when the lights tell you to...
The scenario you have just read is real. The car is
a 2002 530i with 33,000 miles. When this new customer pressed
me for the underlying reason why she had been stranded, I
candidly told her, “lack of maintenance”. When
I asked about her service history she explained how good
she was about taking the car in when the Service Interval
System told her. In 4 years and 33,000 miles, the car had
only been in for service twice, once for an oil change and
again for the newly stripped down Inspection I Service. With
her current lifestyle and busy schedule, she was wholeheartedly
willing to accept a minimalist approach to caring for her
car, especially if it was backed by the manufacturer. She
was convinced BMW’s do not need as much attention as
they did even 3 years ago. It was then that I tried
to enlighten her that “Free Maintenance” came
with a price - you pay for it up front with the purchase
of the car and again after it expires to make up for the
neglect.
It seems
as though vehicles are expected to run perfectly every
time they are driven. For the most part, BMW
drivers take their cars reliability for granted. There
should be one more Law of Physics lesson taught at an early
age – machines require maintenance. BMW owners
rarely envision a lack of preventive maintenance as causing
reliability problems with their ultimate driving machine.
A good
case and point is this customer’s 530i. The
car had an original battery which was no longer capable of
offering a reserve storage charge. It was only capable
of starting the car solely on its surface charge and as long
as the alternator maintained the appropriate 13-14 volts
in the electrical system, everything functioned fine. Keep
in mind the failing battery required constant charging thereby
placing a continuous load on the alternator. As this customer
drove along, she unknowingly placed a depleting load on the
charging system and battery by running a number of accessories
(lights, wipers, A/C, etc.) due to the driving conditions. These
accessory loads coupled with the battery charging requirements
may normally have worked the alternator to its maximum capacity
but not caused a failure. Unfortunately the alternator
was already destined to fail; not because of age but because
of lack of simple maintenance. All modern alternators
require cooling. The alternator of this model is air
cooled, as are a number of other BMW models. The alternator
has to dissipate the heat generated during charging or it
will eventually fail from repeated overheating. During this
car’s history, leaves and other road debris have been
sucked into the alternator cooling duct and then become crammed
into the back of the alternator preventing proper air flow.

The
load placed on this car’s charging system that day
was too much and when the alternator failed, the battery
could offer no assistance and the car ceased to run. This
is just one of many situations that I have experienced in
the last few years that could have been easily prevented
if a sensible level of maintenance was performed.
A simple
maintenance item that is now commonly neglected is the
fuel filter. Fuel filters that used to be changed
at 15,000 mile intervals must now provide fuel system protection
for at least 60,000 miles. These filters are expected
to last for that period of time although no appreciable design
change has transpired. More importantly, the lack of
servicing allows possible fuel contaminants to go unchecked. Added
cost, poor fuel mileage and sometimes engine damage are all
the results of this poor maintenance approach.
At my
shop, we regularly change air filters at 20,000 mile intervals
due to the enormous accumulation of silt/grit clogging
the filter. Air filters protect engine cylinder walls,
pistons and piston rings from ingesting grit that would ruin
an engine in a very short time period. The new style
paper air filters with an added layer of foam are expected
to last up to 60,000 miles. As well as contributing to poor
fuel mileage, the long term ramification is an engine that
may start burning oil by 80,000 miles because of the grit
that makes it through the filter.
Aside
from engine wear, extending air filter change intervals
contributes to air mass meter problems. The sensitive
air mass meter is located directly downstream of the air
filter and can be greatly affected in its operation by just
a film of dirt. This meter is the determining sensor
for the engine air/fuel ratio and once its readings are off,
a host of problems will develop. It is not uncommon
to see fuel trim adaptation values beyond limits, engine
stumble, hesitation, or even cylinder misfires.
Some
of the more complicated examples of preventative maintenance
include testing the car electronically. Indicators
of problems that have not illuminated the Check Engine light/Service
Engine Soon light lurk behind the scenes creating changes
of which the driver is unaware. These may include adaptive
values, sub-system faults or even control unit programming
updates. These can sometimes lead to expensive problems
but if uncovered early enough, can prevent additional cost
or breakdown.
So why
is it that cars are only serviced or repaired when an indicator
comes on? There are many reasons but one
main reason is because as maintenance packages have been
introduced, dealers have urged BMW owners to “just
follow the service interval system”. Most owners
assume that this means the car has a proper maintenance agenda. But
who’s agenda? A marketing department who is only
interested in getting the car through the warranty period;
or you, who expects such a well engineered machine to last
for at least 150,000 miles?
If you
look at what dictates a maintenance schedule, you will
find it is based on the oil change interval. As
synthetic-blended oils have been introduced, oil change intervals
have been extended thereby pushing back other maintenance
necessities. It is not hard to appreciate that when
one small problem goes undetected, it will invariably have
a domino effect on other components adding to the overall
cost of repair. Too often, service programs such as
the Inspection II are interpreted by BMW owners as a superfluous
list of checks and simple replacements for the here and now. In
reality, the checklist is not intended to be black and white. The
overall importance is to read between the lines and identify
possible problems that will lead to added expense or inconvenience
in the miles to come.
Keep
in mind the BMW service interval system uses a math model
to infer the rate of oil degradation based on collected
data. This software based maintenance reminder system
is at best a prediction because it cannot directly measure
the condition of the oil or detect the presence of contamination. Engine
maintenance requirements can also be greatly influenced by
ambient air conditions, fuel formulations and by the actual
condition of the engine.
Changing
oil more regularly can pay off in the long run but it can
also equate to draining a lot of serviceable oil. BMW
has tried to address this and the environmental impact by
using better oils and extending the service interval system
mathematical parameters. However, consider that in
the span of a decade we have gone from a 3000 mile oil change
to a 20,000 mile oil change interval. Because of this,
I routinely see engines at 45,000 miles that have had two
oil changes and are so gunked up that the engine will have
serious problems with lifters, rings and bearings before
the 60,000 mile mark.

As
a general rule, we recommend oil changes depending on each
customer’s driving habits. Usually the mileage
period for changes is 5000 to 7500 miles. We arrived
at this range based on laboratory analysis of oil we drained
from customer’s cars.
For comparison, the following picture is of an engine
with 82k that we have serviced for its life time.
As
an aside about oil changes, lately I have seen an unfortunate
trend of poorly made off-brand oil filters installed in relatively
new cars. Not only are these filters doing a poor job
of filtering oil, but with the extended oil change intervals,
they are literally disintegrating, adding to the contamination
of the engine. When questioned, the customer usually
admits to visiting a nearby quick-lube store. No maintenance
program is worthwhile without quality parts.
Pro-active
repairs have been replaced by a reactive minimalist approach
because in the short run, it costs BMW less and is more
convenient for you. Plainly put, it’s what
works when selling cars. Behind the scenes is a different
story. People I know in the industry from the dealer
level to the aftermarket community (including engineers)
would never subject their own cars to such an insufficient
maintenance schedule. BMW’s service interval
system is set up for one type of ownership and it is not
intended to protect your BMW for the second half of its life. When
you consider that there is nothing exceptionally difficult
about an accelerated approach to maintaining your BMW, the
added years of return will justify the effort.
|